writng

Reflections on #WhyIWrite

image.jpg

The other night I spent some time going through childhood photos looking for a picture my publisher had requested. My mom and I drank wine and reminisced over bad hair, bad clothes, and good memories. I came across the above gem, which is a photo of me in fifth grade with my Reflections (an arts contest run by the PTA) trophy. I had just finished reading my winning poem in front of an audience that probably numbered around forty, but felt like four hundred. This past week, I’ve been glued to the #WhyIWrite hashtag, so the memory felt especially apropos.   

I wrote winning poems several years running in middle school and somewhere there is a small collection of these nifty trophies. The poems themselves were really little stories, little scenes of the larger goings-on of my imagination; they were the beginnings of my fiction writing. I went on to write plenty of poetry throughout high school, a mortifying amount of it about boys. I had a lot of feelings. The poetry thing didn’t stick, and it’s been many years since I’ve written a poem, which is probably a good thing considering that internet exists and they might not all remain tucked away in notebooks as my childhood poems are.

Seeing this photo, I remember how I nervous I was to read in front that audience: made up chiefly of the parents of other winners, I’d imagine. I also remember being really stoked on that matching shirt, velvet choker, and headband combo I’m rocking. And I’m reminded too that it was always there, the desire to write. It was always the subject I excelled at in school, the thing I most looked forward to. Throughout my childhood, she tells me, my mom would find miniature legal pads (which we for some reason always had boxes of) filled with mysterious dialog and snippets of scenes. As far back as I can remember, there’s been this stream of it—the parallel world that my fiction originates from—going on ceaselessly in my mind alongside my real life. It was only as I grew up that, as all children do, I came to understand that my experiences were not universal. Somewhere on the road to adolescence, others tuned this imaginary world out. I couldn’t tell you exactly where or why because I never did. Those of us who don’t, I suppose, become artists or eccentrics or both.

I’m grateful for the circumstances that allowed me to pursue my writing—the immense privilege of educated, encouraging parents and the resources for books and time to read them, education and time to write them. I often stress with students and clients, the necessity to keep the business of being an author separate from the art of being a writer. The latter is so very personal. The truth is, a great many things that are written ought not to be published, but it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be written. Because the act itself is beautiful and important; a measure of grace that should be encouraged in all.

 

Cover Reveal!

I couldn't be more thrilled to share the cover for Losing the Light! It feels utterly surreal to see my name on something that looks like it belongs to a real book: and not only that, a book I I would immediately pick up if I saw it on a table at a bookstore. Where it will be, in about six months time. 

The months of waiting for your debut novel to come out are strange and wondrous: with every step in the process--the copyedit, choosing a title, the first pass pages--inching you ever closer to the dream you've been holding onto for all these many years. 

In addition to my cover, I have another fun piece of material to share: a video that my friends over at Book Country put together for me. Enjoy! 

The Ecstasy of Editorial

Girl Friday, where I work, has all kinds of editorial clients: novelists, memoirists, business book authors, you name it. Most of them are wonderful and grateful for the fabulous work that my talented colleagues do to improve their books. But every once in a while we get someone who just doesn’t want to be told, a writer who rejects the notion that the editorial process will improve their work, which isobviously perfect as it is. Frankly, I find this arrogant and not a little bit self-destructive. In my humble (informed and reasoned) opinion, there is a not a writer in the world whose work cannot be made better, sharper, clearer, and more powerful via the editorial process. Got that? Not one.

I’m not saying there are no bad editors out there—a good fit is paramount—but I believe the process itself to be sacred. Lots of elements of publishing are up for debate in the modern era. This isn’t one of them.

My novel The Sojourn was raised by an editorial village that encompasses everyone from my college mentor to the fine folks at Aria Books. I’ve been working on the novel off and on for twelve years and over that time a number of professors, writers, and colleagues have given me feedback on it. But in the name of brevity, I will only talk about the editorial process as it concerns the book’s most recent iteration.

At the beginning of last year, after a number of attempts at getting published, I decided to have another go. If I was going to take my beloved novel back out into the world, I wanted to give it the best possible chance of succeeding, so I hired one of Girl Friday’s talented editors Amara Holstein to help me out. She was smart and cool and a Francophile like me, a perfect fit. She helped me smooth things on the line and most importantly: cut, cut, cut. I knew I had pacing problems, and I needed an expert third party to tell me what could get the axe. I asked her to ruthlessly extract anything that wasn’t moving the plot forward. Once Amara and I finished our revisions, I sent it out with a certainty that whatever happened, I would know I’d done everything I could. It didn’t take long to see the results of our efforts.

About a month later, I received a revise and resubmit letter from one of my top choice agents Carly Watters. She told me she liked the book but wanted to know if I’d be willing to make some changes. I was thrilled with her feedback. First of all, it meant I had an agent interested who had a keen editorial eye and was willing to do the work necessary to give a book the best chance at selling. And her suggestions themselves felt so spot on it seemed like we’d been working together for years. I revised in a hurry. I sent it back to Carly and she called me the next day. I had other agents looking, but there was no way I wasn’t going with her. In addition to everything else I knew about Carly when I queried her, I now knew that he was a clear communicator and had an editorial eye that could make my work better.

After we sold the book to Atria, I got a chance to work with my in-house editor, the delightful Sarah Cantin. I knew from previous conversations that we had a ton in common and a shared vision for the book. Digging in with her was great fun. Reading her notes and feeling the empathy and appreciation she had for my characters bowled me over. Endings in particular are so tricky, and Sarah helped me hone mine in a way I couldn’t have done without her. After all the years I’d spent with the book, seeing it all come together in a way that felt so right was incredible.

Next came that unsung hero of the editorial process, the copyeditor. A big part of the copyeditor’s job is to clean up mistakes and ensure consistency, but there’s more to it than that. My meticulous copyeditor, Steve Boldt, caught things such as a character getting on the wrong train to her destination, or the fact that I had my heroine calling her mother from France when it would be the middle of the night California time. It’s easy to miss these kinds of details when you’re focusing on bigger issues, but leaving them in could risk distracting the reader, and even losing their confidence. Seeing this manuscript that I’d labored over for so many years get its final polish was a pleasure akin to having my car detailed.

Much is made of what a lonely art writing is, and it’s true that you need to be prepared for some solitude. The years of rejection can be wearying: you wonder if your voice will ever be heard, if anyone will ever give a damn. But it makes it all the sweeter when such gifted people care enough about your work to put their own creative talents into it. Even if it isn’t always easy to hear critical feedback, heed thy editor(s) my friend, they are on your side.  

How to Have the Best 2015 Possible

I originally tried to write a post about making more meaningful resolutions. About planning and giving yourself targets and actionable goals to get from where you are now to where you want to be. You see, I did this for myself in 2014 and it seemed miraculous. I got a book deal, I found love, I got promoted. It was a banner year. As I look forward to 2015, I find myself frantically trying to decode how I managed to have all this good fortune all at once.

It’s true I worked hard for these things, and it definitely helped to set intentions and hold myself accountable. I did some goal-setting with a friend of mine and we had regular check-ins. Giving structure to abstract goals like romantic and artistic achievement can be life-changing. And yet, to pretend I was in control of all the things that happened to me in the last twelve months is laughable. I controlled what I could, the rest was fate, God, the universe, whichever your poison.

2014 was a good year, but the ones that come before? Not so much. 2013 was okay. Nothing great happened, nothing terrible happened. But 2012 and 2011? Those were truly awful years, dominated by an all-consuming family crisis and its accompanying emotional pitfalls, poor decisions, and paralysis.

I choose to believe that I did nothing in this life or any former one to bring about those awful years. Sometimes fate is just a real bitch. Martha Beck, one of my all-time favorite wisdom givers, calls this phenomenon a rumble strip, and suggests that much can be learned from them.

It seems that my own rumble strip produced a happier life on the other side. And perhaps this has as much to do with why 2014 was so good as anything else. If I didn’t engineer my bad years, then I suppose I didn’t completely engineer the good one either. Maybe I just had it coming.  

One of the things I learned from my bad patch is how much you can’t  control: others people’s choices, your family’s health and safety, the vagaries of courts and other bureaucracies. Many things happen that are deeply, profoundly unfair. The upside of being faced with such cosmic indifference, however, is that harnessing the things you can control—your own choices, whom you spend your time with, what you eat, how much you write—suddenly seems wildly simple. That’s the happiness you can plan for, that you can take steps toward.  

I like the esteemed Gretchen Rubin (master planner of happiness) on the subject. For her, it’s all about good habits:

It took me a long time to realize that what I thought of as “resolutions” could almost always be characterized as “habits.” Most often, when people want to make some kind of change in the New Year, they want to master some kind of habit.”

Here are a few of hers.

I love a can-do attitude, but we’d all like to get the universe on our side. For this, let’s turn to my girl Martha Beck for a little practical magic.

She suggests using adjectives to describe your goals rather than the regular noun + verb formula, which can focus you on “imagined situations” rather than “Imagined experiences”.  

”By using adjectives, you can avoid this trap by focusing all your efforts on the quality of the experience you want to create. This process is harder than “normal” goal setting—it requires some serious soul-searching and perhaps a good thesaurus—but it does pay off.”

Incidentally, one of my goals this year is to get back to blogging. Happy 2015.  I’ll be here all year, folks.